Friday, February 8, 2013

A Follow-up And a Rant

The “follow-up” portion of this post will be very brief (I can already sense your collective sigh of relief!). Basically it is just to say that I am increasingly respecting both sides of this particular debate (well, except for the NRA's complete refusal to budge -I have zero respect for that), and I am increasingly appreciating the complexity of this issue. Objective, fact-ridden articles such as this one http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/02/gun-violence-in-america-the-13-key-questions-with-13-concise-answers/272727/
have been especially good at helping me see the “bigger picture” and ask the important questions. Questions such as: Would lowering total gun violence necessarily lower the incidence of mass shootings? How do we close the “private sales background check” loophole? Would banning assault weapons even be effective at this point (considering how many are already in circulation)? What would be effective and how do we access this type of data? You get the idea. Complex stuff.

So, on to the rant (I hope you are as excited as I am). While I've grown in respect for those arguing gun rights, I am more and more bothered by posts such as this one: 

 

or this one:  


or this one: 


or even this one:


(Disclaimer: if it was you, dear reader, who posted these memes, please do not take this as a personal attack. I am going after the meme here -not the meme-poster)

If someone can explain to me the redeeming value of these types of politically-charged memes, please do. I can certainly see purpose, but I wouldn't call it “redeeming.” I can see how they serve to “fire-up the base.” I can see how they lead to mob-think mentality and an added certainty that your chosen group is right because they are very good at pushing emotional buttons while ignoring considerations such as reason and civility.

So, let's take the first one. Let's assume that all the numbers are accurate (which I didn't check, but I would hope the person who posted it had). Even if accurate, the figures lead to a very distorted take-home message. There's a quote I recently came across that really hit home with me: “Figures don't lie, but liars figure.” Like I've said before, if someone is of the opinion that our efforts are misdirected in going after gun control –that there are much more effective ways to save the greatest number of American lives, I would respect that opinion. I would love to discuss it. Clearly though, that is not the take-home message of this particular internet meme; rather, it seems to be to trivialize the negative effects of gun violence on our society in a most insensitive manner. What do these numbers mean to someone who has lost a loved one in a senseless act of gun-violence? How can a figure, like the one presented here, begin to account for the toll that tragedies like Sandy Hook take on our National morale?

I'm discovering that what really bothers me about political memes isn't so much what is said, but all the things that are left unsaid --the second meme being my case-in-point. It conveniently looks over the profound differences in nature that exist between a car and a gun (e.g. a car was invented to transport people from point A to point B, a gun was invented to hunt and kill), the profoundly different ways their misuse as well as their appropriate use affects society, and the profoundly different ways we potentially deal with each problem. It also jumps to the conclusion that guns will be completely taken away, when, so far anyway, I haven't heard any politician putting that idea forward. But none of that matters because it accomplishes what it was meant to accomplish; it pushes on all the right emotional hot-spots.

Even the third meme, which I find least offensive, still gives me some pause. I appreciate the comparison it is making (really, I do), but as you follow this comparison further, some important differences become apparent. Like the idea that increasing the availability of fire extinguishers, as opposed to guns, isn't going to increase the likelihood of more fires occurring (i.e. the need for the fire extinguisher in the first place).

And the last meme. It really seems innocent enough. But think of how easy it would be to find some contradictory statement from a different general authority (or even from the same general authority) given at a different place and time and to then use that quote to “challenge” the first quote. I also don't like quotes like this being taken out of context without the whole background being given. Mostly, I just don't like seeing our general authorities being paraded around on facebook like puppets being made to support this or that political opinion (I know that sounds harsh. Does anyone else feel this way?) Sharing quotes by general authorities to bare testimony or to uplift others seems like a different matter entirely.

Before I sign-out, it's confession time. Amid all this meme-angst, I actually sought out a pro-gun control meme. I wanted to make a statement. I wanted to “fight back.” And I had a very specific meme in mind. It was going to be The Doctor (from BBC's Doctor Who) looking totally awesome, saving planets right and left, feared by villains throughout time and space, and armed with only a humble sonic-screwdriver. There would also be some pithy quote or text to drive the message home. I'd like to say it never got posted to my wall because I saw the error of my ways. Because I realized the hypocrisy. Because I didn't want to add to the meme-induced idiocy. I'd like to say that, but it wouldn't be true. It never got posted because I couldn't find one out there, and I lacked the ambition and know-how to make one myself. And yet, as I type this, I am starting to see some value in the memes that increasingly fill our social-media world. As long as we don't view any particular meme as an end in and of itself. As long as we view it has a starting point -as a springboard into deeper waters.    

No comments:

Post a Comment